<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Philosophical Debates Over Calvinism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civitatedei.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/philosophical-debates-over-calvinism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civitatedei.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/philosophical-debates-over-calvinism/</link>
	<description>Grant me productivity, but not yet.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:35:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul M.</title>
		<link>http://civitatedei.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/philosophical-debates-over-calvinism/#comment-1259</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 01:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civitatedei.wordpress.com/?p=330#comment-1259</guid>
		<description>Hi Matthew,

I have collected all the back-and-forth between us and Reppert into a single post. Perhaps this will be helpful:

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2008/06/calvinism-vs-arminianism.html#comments</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matthew,</p>
<p>I have collected all the back-and-forth between us and Reppert into a single post. Perhaps this will be helpful:</p>
<p><a href="http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2008/06/calvinism-vs-arminianism.html#comments" rel="nofollow">http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2008/06/calvinism-vs-arminianism.html#comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://civitatedei.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/philosophical-debates-over-calvinism/#comment-1129</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 02:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civitatedei.wordpress.com/?p=330#comment-1129</guid>
		<description>That is definitely a good link. Unfortunately, it is one-sided. A debate needs two sides. I suggest the this site (it also has plenty of links):

http://arminianperspectives.wordpress.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is definitely a good link. Unfortunately, it is one-sided. A debate needs two sides. I suggest the this site (it also has plenty of links):</p>
<p><a href="http://arminianperspectives.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://arminianperspectives.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Pemberton</title>
		<link>http://civitatedei.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/philosophical-debates-over-calvinism/#comment-1124</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Pemberton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 20:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civitatedei.wordpress.com/?p=330#comment-1124</guid>
		<description>You should be able to find some leads at:

http://www.monergism.com/

They have links to anything concerning reformed theology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should be able to find some leads at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.monergism.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.monergism.com/</a></p>
<p>They have links to anything concerning reformed theology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://civitatedei.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/philosophical-debates-over-calvinism/#comment-1120</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 17:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civitatedei.wordpress.com/?p=330#comment-1120</guid>
		<description>The site is actually www.frame-poythress.org

The closest that I could come to finding actual Calvinism related philosophy were articles on Free Will &amp; Moral Responsibility, Open Theism and Rationality in the Calvinist Tradition. Perhaps you were thinking of his book &quot;Doctrine of God&quot;?

In any case, Frame is an easy opponent. All you need to do is point out that his understanding of libertarian freedom is a straw man. He lacks well-thought out reasons against it. My Calvinist friend (now in Texas) is way better than him at this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The site is actually <a href="http://www.frame-poythress.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.frame-poythress.org</a></p>
<p>The closest that I could come to finding actual Calvinism related philosophy were articles on Free Will &amp; Moral Responsibility, Open Theism and Rationality in the Calvinist Tradition. Perhaps you were thinking of his book &#8220;Doctrine of God&#8221;?</p>
<p>In any case, Frame is an easy opponent. All you need to do is point out that his understanding of libertarian freedom is a straw man. He lacks well-thought out reasons against it. My Calvinist friend (now in Texas) is way better than him at this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thebrooks</title>
		<link>http://civitatedei.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/philosophical-debates-over-calvinism/#comment-1112</link>
		<dc:creator>thebrooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 20:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civitatedei.wordpress.com/?p=330#comment-1112</guid>
		<description>There are no debates on this topic here, but frame-poythress.com has some innovative arguments for Calvinism from a Van Tillian P.O.V.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are no debates on this topic here, but frame-poythress.com has some innovative arguments for Calvinism from a Van Tillian P.O.V.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://civitatedei.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/philosophical-debates-over-calvinism/#comment-1111</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 19:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civitatedei.wordpress.com/?p=330#comment-1111</guid>
		<description>The Craig-Curley debate is found at http://www.reasonablefaith.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&amp;id=5283

Curley is definitely an easy target. He does not manage to actually defeat Craig in any way. Hopefully, Paul Helm is a better opponent for him. (This is what I was looking for.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Craig-Curley debate is found at <a href="http://www.reasonablefaith.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&amp;id=5283" rel="nofollow">http://www.reasonablefaith.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&amp;id=5283</a></p>
<p>Curley is definitely an easy target. He does not manage to actually defeat Craig in any way. Hopefully, Paul Helm is a better opponent for him. (This is what I was looking for.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brooks</title>
		<link>http://civitatedei.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/philosophical-debates-over-calvinism/#comment-1110</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 13:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civitatedei.wordpress.com/?p=330#comment-1110</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a debate between Bill Craig and an atheist where the atheist equates Christianity with Calvinism. Craig responds by critiquing Calvinism and in the process mentions Shank&#039;s &quot;Elect in the Son&quot;, says he&#039;s more in the Wesleyan stream of Christianity, etc. 

I forget the atheist&#039;s name, but it should be on Craig&#039;s website.

I found it really helpful when I was against Calvinism. 

Outside of that, I&#039;m not really sure. There&#039;s Paul Helm&#039;s contribution to 4 views on Divine Foreknowledge. He interacts with Craig there, albeit quite poorly. 

Most of the debates I&#039;ve seen have been exegetical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a debate between Bill Craig and an atheist where the atheist equates Christianity with Calvinism. Craig responds by critiquing Calvinism and in the process mentions Shank&#8217;s &#8220;Elect in the Son&#8221;, says he&#8217;s more in the Wesleyan stream of Christianity, etc. </p>
<p>I forget the atheist&#8217;s name, but it should be on Craig&#8217;s website.</p>
<p>I found it really helpful when I was against Calvinism. </p>
<p>Outside of that, I&#8217;m not really sure. There&#8217;s Paul Helm&#8217;s contribution to 4 views on Divine Foreknowledge. He interacts with Craig there, albeit quite poorly. </p>
<p>Most of the debates I&#8217;ve seen have been exegetical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://civitatedei.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/philosophical-debates-over-calvinism/#comment-1109</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civitatedei.wordpress.com/?p=330#comment-1109</guid>
		<description>Might be. It would depend what issues they were discussing and whether they were discussed in a philosophical manner. I will check it out and see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might be. It would depend what issues they were discussing and whether they were discussed in a philosophical manner. I will check it out and see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://civitatedei.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/philosophical-debates-over-calvinism/#comment-1108</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 18:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civitatedei.wordpress.com/?p=330#comment-1108</guid>
		<description>I think Boars Head had some links to Calvinism vs. Emerging debates recently. I&#039;m not sure if that&#039;s what you want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Boars Head had some links to Calvinism vs. Emerging debates recently. I&#8217;m not sure if that&#8217;s what you want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
